6862011

The transcript 6 lines · 0 carrying a learned rule

1. 01
   reader

   in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety- six , at Richford

   verifier

   in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six , at Richford

   Two models, two readings — 1% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. [begin handwritten] October [end handwritten] 1896, at [begin handwritten] Richford [end handwritten] in said District,

      12006897 · p.24 laurakjaersgaard 0.56

   2. Given under my hand, at St. Albans, in the County of Franklin in the State and District of Vermont, this 30 day of Sept A.D. 1896

      12006897 · p.22 aismail 0.46

   3. Vermont, this [begin handwritten] 1st [end handwritten] day of [begin handwritten] October [end handwritten] 1896

      12006897 · p.24 laurakjaersgaard 0.45

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 95
2. 02
   reader

   in the County of Franklin , in the State and District of Vermont, aforesaid, and within the

   verifier

   in the County of Franklin , in the State and District of Vermont, aforesaid, and within the

   Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. At [begin handwritten] Richford [end handwritten], in said District, on this

      12006897 · p.21 laurakjaersgaard 0.42

   2. [begin handwritten] October [end handwritten] 1896, at [begin handwritten] Richford [end handwritten] in said District,

      12006897 · p.24 laurakjaersgaard 0.38

   3. DISTRICT OF VERMONT

      12006897 · p.3 findawayanastasia 0.38

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 96
3. 03
   reader

   jurisdiction of this Court, was then and there a Chinese person, that is to say a per-

   verifier

   jurisdiction of this Court, was then and there a Chinese person, that is to say a per-

   Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. be deported to China, from whence he came, and that he be

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.42

   2. [crossed out "who"] is a chinese laborer ad not entitled lawfully to be and remain in the United States, for the reason that he, the said Lung Fook alias [space] did not have and is not provided with a

      12006897 · p.12 rlz 0.40

   3. WHEREAS, the said [handwritten] Lung Fook a Chinaman [end handwritten] before said Commissioner with [crossed out "having"] [illegible, handwritten] on the [handwritten] 9th [end handwritten] day of [handwritten] November [end handwritten] A. D 190[handwritten]4 [crossed out "committed a Criminal offense against the laws of the United States, to wit: that he did"] unlawfully within the United States and not entitled to be and remain therein [end handwritten]

      12006897 · p.8 rlz 0.39

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 98
4. 04
   reader

   son of Chinese descent,unlawfully and without right within the United

   verifier

   son of Chinese descent,unlawfully and without right within the United

   Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. be deported to China, from whence he came, and that he be

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.42

   2. [crossed out "who"] is a chinese laborer ad not entitled lawfully to be and remain in the United States, for the reason that he, the said Lung Fook alias [space] did not have and is not provided with a

      12006897 · p.12 rlz 0.41

   3. Revised Statutes of the United States; unlawfully [end crossed out] [begin handwritten] a Chinese laborer

      12006897 · p.18 laurakjaersgaard 0.38

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 98
5. 05
   reader

   States,that is to say, at Richford aforesaid,

   verifier

   States,that is to say, at Richford aforesaid,

   Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. At [begin handwritten] Richford [end handwritten], in said District, on this

      12006897 · p.21 laurakjaersgaard 0.48

   2. [begin handwritten] October [end handwritten] 1896, at [begin handwritten] Richford [end handwritten] in said District,

      12006897 · p.24 laurakjaersgaard 0.45

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 98
6. 06
   reader

   contrary to the form, force and effect of the Statutes of the United States in such case made and provided, and

   verifier

   contrary to the form, force and effect of the Statutes of the United States in such case made and provided, and

   Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

   Read before, by a person same file unit

   1. contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the

      12006897 · p.18 laurakjaersgaard 0.62

   2. Contrary to the statutes in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the United States.

      12006897 · p.14 gtav 0.57

   3. in violation of Section..................of the Revised Statutes of the United State did unlawafully

      12006897 · p.24 laurakjaersgaard 0.43

   Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

   verified 96