Longhand reads a hand, learns your rules, refuses what it cannot prove stream connecting

6862011

series 6862011 · transcriber volunteer · sink dryrun

The page 12006897 · leaf 7

Page 7 of 12006897
https://catalog.archives.gov/medialive/97/68/12006897/content/arcmedia/central-plains/kansas-city/6862011/Fook_008.jpg
  • verified
  • approved
  • disputed
  • uncertain
  • illegible
  • draft

Text as extracted 

tenements, and to the United States rendered if default be made in the conditions following, to-wit:
WHEREAS, the said Lung Fook a Chinaman
being ha s been charged on oath
before said Commissioner with having on the 9th day of November A. D 190 4,
committed a Criminal offense against the laws of the United States, to wit: that he did
unlawfully within the United States and not entitled to
be and remain therein
as will at large and more fully appear by the said complaint.
And upon such complaint being filed said Commissioner did issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, who
ha s been brought before said Commissioner to answer to said charge and witnesses having been examined in re-
lation to said charge, in the presence of the accused; and upon said examination it appearing to said Com-
missioner that the offense with which the accused stands charged has been committed, and that there is probable
is true; whereupon said commissioner ordered said Lung Fook to be deported to China
and the said Lung Fook having taken an appeal from the judgment of said Commr
he thereupon ordered the accused to find sufficient bail in the sum of one hundred
to the United States District Court Division of the Eastern Judicial District of

The transcript 16 lines · 0 carrying a learned rule

  1. reader

    tenements, and to the United States rendered if default be made in the conditions following, to-wit:

    verifier

    tenements, and to the United States rendered if default be made in the conditions following, to-wit:

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 98
  2. reader

    WHEREAS, the said Lung Fook a Chinaman

    verifier

    WHEREAS, the said Lung Fook a Chinaman ha s been charged on oath

    Two models, two readings — 41% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same file unit

    1. Signed, sealed and acknowledged by the said Lung Fook. Chas. P. Johnson & Wong Lee

      12006897 · p.21 aismail 0.57

    2. WHEREAS, the said [handwritten] Lung Fook [end handwritten] ha[handwritten]s [end handwritten] been charged on oath with having on the [handwritten] 9th [end handwritten] day of [handwritten] Nov [end handwritten] A. D. 190[handwritten]4 [end handwritten], committed a Criminal offense against the laws of the United States, to-wit that he [crossed out "did"] [handwritten] being a Chinese laborer and not provided with a certificate of identity was unlawfully within the United States [end handwritten]

      12006897 · p.10 rlz 0.55

    3. Lung Fook, (a Chinaman) [Last three lines in bracket]

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.53

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    Line 2: the two readings differ. Reader has 'WHEREAS, the said Lung Fook a Chinaman'; the verifier read 'WHEREAS, the said Lung Fook a Chinaman ha s been charged on oath'. Which is right?

    If you never answer, Longhand writes [illegible] — never a guess.

    disputed 95
  3. reader

    being ha s been charged on oath

    verifier

    before said Commissioner with having on the 9 th day of November A. D. 190 4,

    Two models, two readings — 77% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same series

    1. ____________________________________________________________ has been charged on oath

      12006922 · p.9 Mae 0.57

    2. has been charged on oath with having on the 27th day of April A. D. 1906, committed a Criminal offense

      12006909 · p.9 jlaulu 0.44

    3. charged.

      12006909 · p.2 emily4621 0.40

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    Line 3: the two readings differ. Reader has 'being ha s been charged on oath'; the verifier read 'before said Commissioner with having on the 9 th day of November A. D. 190 4,'. Which is right?

    If you never answer, Longhand writes [illegible] — never a guess.

    disputed 93
  4. reader

    before said Commissioner with having on the 9th day of November A. D 190 4,

    verifier

    before said Commissioner with having on the 9 th day of November A. D. 190 4,

    Two models, two readings — 3% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same file unit

    1. [begin handwritten] 9 [end handwritten] day of [begin handwritten] Nov. [end handwritten] 1904

      12006897 · p.19 laurakjaersgaard 0.46

    2. [begin handwritten] 9' [end handwritten] day of [begin handwritten] Nov. [end handwritten] 1904

      12006897 · p.19 laurakjaersgaard 0.45

    3. Subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned, on this 9th day of Nov.r 1904

      12006897 · p.14 gtav 0.44

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    verified 95
  5. reader

    committed a Criminal offense against the laws of the United States, to wit: that he did

    verifier

    committed a Criminal offense against the laws of the United States, to wit: that he did

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 95
  6. reader

    unlawfully within the United States and not entitled to

    verifier

    unlawfully within the United States and not entitled to

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 94
  7. reader

    be and remain therein

    verifier

    be and remain therein

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 96
  8. reader

    as will at large and more fully appear by the said complaint.

    verifier

    as will at large and more fully appear by the said complaint.

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 98
  9. reader

    And upon such complaint being filed said Commissioner did issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, who

    verifier

    And upon such complaint being filed said Commissioner did issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, who

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 98
  10. reader

    ha s been brought before said Commissioner to answer to said charge and witnesses having been examined in re-

    verifier

    ha s been brought before said Commissioner to answer to said charge and witnesses having been examined in re-

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 97
  11. reader

    lation to said charge, in the presence of the accused; and upon said examination it appearing to said Com-

    verifier

    lation to said charge, in the presence of the accused; and upon said examination it appearing to said Com-

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 98
  12. reader

    missioner that the offense with which the accused stands charged has been committed, and that there is probable

    verifier

    missioner that the offense with which the accused stands charged has been committed, and that there is probable

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 95
  13. reader

    is true; whereupon said commissioner ordered said Lung Fook to be deported to China

    verifier

    is true; whereupon said commissioner ordered said Lung Fook to be deported to China

    Two models, two readings — 0% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    verified 94
  14. reader

    and the said Lung Fook having taken an appeal from the judgment of said Commr

    verifier

    and the said Lung Fook having taken an appeal from the judgment of said Comm

    Two models, two readings — 1% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same file unit

    1. by said commissioner be affirmed; that the said Lung Fook

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.66

    2. the undersigned doth find that the said Lung Fook is not en-

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.47

    3. Lung Fook,

      12006897 · p.13 rlz 0.46

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    verified 92
  15. reader

    he thereupon ordered the accused to find sufficient bail in the sum of one hundred

    verifier

    and the said Lung Fook having taken an appeal from the judgment of said Comm

    Two models, two readings — 78% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same file unit

    1. 22 day of Nov 1904; then and there to answer the complaint preferred against _____ and that in default of finding such bail the accused shall stand for trial.

      12006897 · p.21 aismail 0.47

    2. required to give bail in the sum of [begin handwritten] 500 [end handwritten] Dollars, for [begin handwritten] his [end handwritten] appearance before [begin handwritten] said Commissioner [end handwritten]

      12006897 · p.16 laurakjaersgaard 0.46

    3. And upon such complaint being filed said Commissioner did issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, who ha[handwritten]s [end handwritten] been brought before said Commissioner for examination, and said examination having been [handwritten] continued [end handwritten] for [crossed out "the reason that"] [handwritten] further testimony [end handwritten] and said offense being bailable by said Commissioner, he thereupon ordered the accused to find sufficient bail in the sum of [handwritten] 500 [end handwritten] Dollars, for [handwritten] his [end handwritten] appearance before said Commissioner, [page cut off] the City of St. Louis, in said Division of said District, on the

      12006897 · p.10 rlz 0.45

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    Line 15: the two readings differ. Reader has 'he thereupon ordered the accused to find sufficient bail in the sum of one hundred'; the verifier read 'and the said Lung Fook having taken an appeal from the judgment of said Comm'. Which is right?

    If you never answer, Longhand writes [illegible] — never a guess.

    disputed 88
  16. reader

    to the United States District Court Division of the Eastern Judicial District of

    verifier

    the United States District Court issioner of the Eastern Judicial District of

    Two models, two readings — 10% apart. You are choosing, not rubber-stamping.

    Read before, by a person same file unit

    1. Eastern Division of the Eastern Judicial

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.48

    2. EASTERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.47

    3. EASTERN DISTRICT OF THE

      12006897 · p.1 choward2 0.45

    Retrieved from transcriptions volunteers already submitted to the catalog. Evidence, not an answer — the reading is still yours.

    verified 86
verdict ask human awaiting human kernel: longhand.policy.kernel

Refused — 2 reasons. Nothing will be written.

  • verifier disagreement The two models read the page differently A second, independent model returned a different reading for at least one line. A person has to choose the reading before it can be written to a public archive. lines
  • no approval No human approval matches this exact text Approval is bound to the words on screen. If the transcript changed after it was approved, the old approval no longer counts — approve the current text.

bound to 64dd572dacb7

sink dryrun · a dry run reports unsent, never a false checkmark